Pasi Eronen: Editorial nits:

o  Section 2: Should have reference to RFC2119 (keywords)
o  Section 3: s/preformed/performed/
o  Section 4: "To secure the various functions, a set of new Neighbor 
   Discovery options introduced." -> "...options is introduced."
o  Section 5.3: The name of the algorithm is "RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5", 
   not "RSASSA-PKCS1-v2_1".
o  Section 5.3.2: s/TheDigital/The Digital/
o  Section 5.3.2: s/preceeding/preceding/
o  Section 5.4.2.2: s/dritf/drift/
o  Section 5.4.2.2: s/acepted/accepted/
o  Section 6.5.1: s/advertize/advertise/, twice
o  Section 6.5.1: s/AFI/Address Family Identifier/
o  Section 7.2.2: s/eighbor/neighbor/
o  References: are 9 (RFC3041) and 12 (RFC 3531) really normative?
o  References: 26 (draft-ietf-send-cga) is certainly normative
o  References: 10,14,28,29,30,31,32,33 are never cited anywhere;
o  Intellectual Property Statement: should contain the 
   boilerplate from Section 10.4(d) of RFC2026 
   (add <?rfc iprnotified='yes'?> for xml2rfc).

---------

Jari Arkko: All adopted. RFCs 3041 and 3531 moved to
non-normative references section.